Several of these are listed below. The term is traced back to the Roman Emperor Hadrian reigned AD — but the concept is as old as the recorded history. I have set for thee the might, victory and strength of thy mighty sword in every land I assign them to thy mighty sword I have thy terror in every heart I have set thy fear in every country, thy fear encircles the mountains, and the chiefs tremble at the mention of thee In , at the peak of World War II, the founder of the Paneuropean Union , Richard von Coudenhove-Kalergi , argued that after the War the United States is bound to take "command of the skies" to ensure the lasting world peace:.
But the inauguration of such a glorious century of peace demands from us abandonment of old conceptions of peace. The new Angel of Peace must no longer be pictured as a charming but helpless lady with an olive branch in her hand, but like the Goddess of Justice with a balance in her left and a sword in her right; or like the Archangel Michael, with a fiery sword and wings of steel, fighting the devil to restore and protect the peace of heaven.
In , former US Secretary of Defense Ash Carter envisaged that the rebalance to the Asia-Pacific will make the region "peaceful" through "strength":. You, and your fellow soldiers, sailors, airmen, and Marines will solidify the rebalance, you will make this network work, and you will help the Asia-Pacific And play the role only America can play You'll do so with strength.
The US force posture combined with the allies will "preserve peace through strength. Associated with peace through strength are concepts of preponderance of power as opposed to balance of power , hegemonic stability theory , unipolar stability , and imperial peace such as Pax Romana , Pax Britannica , or Pax Americana. Leon Trotsky , a Marxist theorist, assumed that a proletariat world revolution would lead to world peace.
Proponents of the democratic peace theory claim that strong empirical evidence exists that democracies never or rarely wage war against each other. There are, however, several wars between democracies that have taken place, historically. In her essay "The Roots of War", Ayn Rand held that the major wars of history were started by the more controlled economies of the time against the freer ones and that capitalism gave mankind the longest period of peace in history—a period during which there were no wars involving the entire civilized world—from the end of the Napoleonic wars in to the outbreak of World War I in , with the exceptions of the Franco-Prussian War , the Spanish—American War , and the American Civil War — , which notably occurred in perhaps the most liberal economy in the world at the beginning of the industrial revolution.
Proponents of Cobdenism claim that by removing tariffs and creating international free trade wars would become impossible, because free trade prevents a nation from becoming self-sufficient , which is a requirement for long wars.
However, free trade does not prevent a nation from establishing some sort of emergency plan to become temporarily self-sufficient in case of war or that a nation could simply acquire what it needs from a different nation. A good example of this is World War I , during which both Britain and Germany became partially self-sufficient. This is particularly important because Germany had no plan for creating a war economy.
More generally, free trade—while not making wars impossible—can make wars, and restrictions on trade caused by wars, very costly for international companies with production, research, and sales in many different nations. Thus, a powerful lobby—unless there are only national companies—will argue against wars.
Mutual assured destruction is a doctrine of military strategy in which a full-scale use of nuclear weapons by two opposing sides would effectively result in the destruction of both belligerents. After World War II, the United Nations was established by the United Nations Charter to "save successive generations from the scourge of war which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind" Preamble.
The Preamble to the United Nations Charter also aims to further the adoption of fundamental human rights, to respect obligations to sources of international law as well as to unite the strength of independent countries in order to maintain international peace and security. All treaties on international human rights law make reference to or consider "the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and "peace in the world".
Hinckley saw a trend in national politics by which city-states and nation-states have unified and suggests that the international arena will eventually follow suit.
Many countries such as China, Italy, the United States, Australia, Germany, India and Britain have unified into single nation-states with others like the European Union following suit, suggesting that further globalization will bring about a world state. World peace has been depicted as a consequence of local, self-determined behaviors that inhibit the institutionalization of power and ensuing violence.
The solution is not so much based on an agreed agenda, or an investment in higher authority whether divine or political, but rather a self-organized network of mutually supportive mechanisms, resulting in a viable politico-economic social fabric. The principal technique for inducing convergence is thought experiment , namely backcasting , enabling anyone to participate no matter what cultural background, religious doctrine, political affiliation or age demographic.
Similar collaborative mechanisms are emerging from the Internet around open-source projects, including Wikipedia, and the evolution of other social media.
Economic norms theory links economic conditions with institutions of governance and conflict, distinguishing personal clientelist economies from impersonal market-oriented ones, identifying the latter with permanent peace within and between nations. Through most of human history societies have been based on personal relations: Today in most lower-income societies hierarchies of groups distribute wealth based on personal relationships among group leaders, a process often linked with clientelism and corruption.
Michael Mousseau argues that in this kind of socio-economy conflict is always present, latent or overt, because individuals depend on their groups for physical and economic security and are thus loyal to their groups rather than their states, and because groups are in a constant state of conflict over access to state coffers. Through processes of bounded rationality , people are conditioned towards strong in-group identities and are easily swayed to fear outsiders, psychological predispositions that make possible sectarian violence, genocide, and terrorism.
Market-oriented socio-economies are integrated not with personal ties but the impersonal force of the market where most individuals are economically dependent on trusting strangers in contracts enforced by the state. This creates loyalty to a state that enforces the rule of law and contracts impartially and reliably and provides equal protection in the freedom to contract — that is, liberal democracy.
Wars cannot happen within or between nations with market-integrated economies because war requires the harming of others, and in these kinds of economies everyone is always economically better off when others in the market are also better off, not worse off. Rather than fight, citizens in market-oriented socio-economies care deeply about everyone's rights and welfare, so they demand economic growth at home and economic cooperation and human rights abroad. In fact, nations with market-oriented socio-economies tend to agree on global issues  and not a single fatality has occurred in any dispute between them.
Economic norms theory should not be confused with classical liberal theory. The latter assumes that markets are natural and that freer markets promote wealth. One proposed mechanism for world peace involves consumer purchasing of renewable and equitable local food and power sources involving artificial photosynthesis ushering in a period of social and ecological harmony known as the Sustainocene.
It is dedicated to peace, and specifically the absence of war and violence, such as might be occasioned by a temporary ceasefire in a combat zone for humanitarian aid access.
The day was first celebrated in , and is kept by many nations, political groups, military groups, and peoples. In , for the first time, the day has been dedicated to peace education , i. The lesser peace is essentially a collective security agreement between the nations of the world.
In this arrangement, nations agree to protect one another by rising up against an aggressor nation, should it seek the usurpation of territory or the destruction of its neighbors. The lesser peace is limited in scope and is concerned with the establishment of basic order and the universal recognition of national borders and the sovereignty of nations. The most great peace is the eventual end goal of the lesser peace and is envisioned as a time of spiritual and social unity — a time when the peoples of the world genuinely identify with and care for one another, rather than simply tolerating one other's existence.
The larger world peace process and its foundational elements are addressed in the document The Promise of World Peace , written by the Universal House of Justice.
Many Buddhists believe that world peace can only be achieved if we first establish peace within our minds. The idea is that anger and other negative states of mind are the cause of wars and fighting.
Buddhists believe people can live in peace and harmony only if we abandon negative emotions such as anger in our minds and cultivate positive emotions such as love and compassion. As with all Dharmic religions Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism , ahimsa avoidance of violence is a central concept. Peace pagodas are monuments that are built to symbolize and inspire world peace and have been central to the peace movement throughout the years. A Peace Essay can take a war as a theme and it can explain how peace needs to prevail, despite all the turmoil and the disorder.
This Peace Essay talks about the hardships of modern warfare, as many harmful weapons are used. This Peace essay emphasizes the killing of innocent people due to the war, which is surely uncalled for. A Peace Essay can be written by an author or a columnist from any part of the world, about the recent wars which have happened. Peace Essays are promoted by the United Nations Organisation as well.
This organization has been formed to promote peace and unity in this world. Peace Essays have been written by political leaders as well. The citizens of the world look up to them as role models, and their opinions count in matters of war and peace. An Essay on Peace can make the world, a better place to live. Essay on Peace is responsible for progress and development in this world, as during war it is hard to pursue them.
The possibilities of World War are thus increased and those of peace minimized. Apart form this, there is the questions of 'black and white'. Apart form this, there is the questions of 'black and white'.
The world's future in world peace can be predicted by none, but I, as many people do, have my own theory. I believe that world peace will never be attained, that it .
Peace is the mother of progress. Without peace a nation cannot make any progress. So peace is ever desirable. But now-a-days if there be no peace, the whole human race will be destroyed. Because modern war involves atom bomb and hydrogen bomb. So, war should always be avoided for world peace. Essay on Peace: Need and Importance of Peace! The issue of war and peace has always been a focal issue in all periods of history and at all levels relations among nations. The concern of the humankind for peace can be assessed by taking into account the fact that all religions, all religious.
"The World Peace". World peace is almost impossible because of the money, the power, and the envy between the people.. Money, is the responsible why we do not have peace in the World. In our world is almost impossible to subsist without money. Money is a bad necessary need in our daily life. The problem is what people do to obtain richness/5(3). World peace is an ideal of freedom, peace, and happiness among and within all nations and/or people. World peace is an idea of planetary non-violence by which nations willingly cooperate, either voluntarily or by virtue of a system of governance that prevents warfare.