Skip Nav

How Do You Start a Debate Introduction?

Our Vision

❶Signposting refers to the Debater signaling to the judges on what the various components of the speech are. Main headings will probably consist of arguments, while subheadings will contain different pieces of supporting evidence.

What Is the General Format When Conducting a Debate?

Constructing a speech
Writing the Debate Speech
What Are Some Good Topics for a Debate?

Write this more detailed outline as if you were speaking in the debate. This will help you with wording and understand your own argument, and coming up with logical questions and rebuttals for your opponent. A sound argument will be based on solid evidence that you can back up with if necessary.

Avoid using a straw man. Often used by beginning debaters in their outlines, the straw man fallacy is when you misrepresent your opponents case by describing it wrongly to the audience. Watch out for the slippery slope. When making your outline for your case and rebuttals, it may be easy to refer to using the slippery slope fallacy. This happens when you assume something more extreme will happen on the basis that something less extreme is about to occur. Be careful of the ad hominem fallacy.

Often used by the losing part of a debate, the ad hominem fallacy is when instead of attacking the merit of a case being presented, the opponent makes personal attacks against the person presenting the case.

This is unrelated, may or may not be true, and has no effect on the debate. Avoid asking loaded questions. When loaded questions are used in debate, they seemingly point to an obvious fault in the argument, when instead they have caught the debater off-guard.

Avoid using ambiguous language and explanations. This is where you give unclear explanations and are incredibly vague in your descriptions of things and events. Stay away from the bandwagon fallacy. This is one of the most commonly committed fallacies, in which you assume something is correct or good simply because it is of popular belief. For example, you state in your argument that because most people promote the death penalty, that it is the most effective means of punishment.

Be careful of using the false dilemma fallacy. Often used at the end of a debate to highlight the goodness of making a decision in your favor, the false dilemma fallacy occurs when you offer only two final options black or white when there may indeed be several other options available. For example, your opponent states that as a result, the only two options are to legalize all drugs or to outlaw them.

Avoid using anecdotes instead of evidence. When presenting to an audience, often it is easier to rely on personal experiences and stories as the basis for an argument rather than finding clear evidence that supports a belief. For example, your opponent argues that because their friend decided to have their baby instead of having an abortion and ended up happier, all women will feel the same way in a similar position. The first step is to pick a topic that really means something to you.

Then, decide if you are against it or for it. Research your topic more and get some facts and information. Then, state your own opinions about the topic and make sure to write down your resources, then debate. Not Helpful 0 Helpful 0. How do I write an apologetic team debate outline with case, evidence and rebuttals? Answer this question Flag as Is deafness a pathological cause or cultural cause? Include your email address to get a message when this question is answered.

Already answered Not a question Bad question Other. For the fracking issue, you could point out that arguments about an environmental phenomenon should not be based primarily on an economic or foreign policy issues. The opposition could question the scientific evidence against fracking procedures or point out that the argument so far ignores some important factors such as the opportunity fracking offers to generate electricity at half the CO2 emissions of coal. Insert transition markers to keep the arguments in the middle of the speech from merging with each other.

For instance, you could say: Sum up the key points you have presented and if time permits what the other speakers have presented.

Debate speeches often end with a flourish -- a showy, emotional or dramatic tone that conveys intensity of feeling. Petrona founded Wild Spirit Louisiana, an organic farm, nature conservatory, and education center for sustainable and holistic living.

The database based on Word Net is a lexical database for the English Language. Constructing a Speech Pearson Ed. Debate Writing Best Library. This allows the debater to create some differentiation from the rest of the speakers while making the topic a little more interesting.

Ideally, the anecdote should be related to the motion. On some occasions, Debaters can get an additional benefit from this technique by becoming authority figures. For instance, on a motion about the United Nations, a Debater who has worked or interned at the UN will be able to speak with more authority. Thus, the Debater can make reference to an incident or episode during the stint at the UN. The use of famous quotes related to the topic can also be a good way to start a speech.

These are formulated well and are usually short and sharp, which allows the debaters to proceed quickly into these speeches. Debaters should avoid the mere recitation of the quote prior to proceeding to the case. Instead, they should explain how the quote relates to the motion at hand. The use of humour can be effective in easing the tension in the room and establishing a rapport with the audience and the judges.

Although the Debater is free to use any type of jokes or quips, it will be best if there are related to the topic in some way. The use of humour always involves some risks. If the humour goes unappreciated, the silence will be awkward and deafening and the Debater will be embarrassed. Worse, the humour could backfire if it ends up offending the audience or the judges.

The conclusion to a speech is just as important as the introduction. The judges will be close to making up their minds on the score to be given to the speakers and a strong finish could assist in pushing the score a little higher.

Thus, speakers should get rid of bad habits such as panicked and rushed endings or incomplete conclusions trailing off as they return to their seats. Instead, they should allocate some time at the end of their speeches for a strong and effective conclusion.

One technique to wrap up the speech to refer back to the introduction and finish on the same theme. Thus, if an anecdote was used, the conclusion could refer to the same story for a fitting conclusion.

The speaker with the UN experience can sum up the speech by referring to the lessons learnt at the end of the tenure. Quotations work even better at the end of speeches as they are short and can be delivered with a flourish; useful when there will be little time left for the speaker.

Speakers who provide a summation of the key components of the speech just delivered will be able to remind the judges of all the points covered. This will ensure that the judges did not miss a single point. This also lets the judges know that the speaker had complete control over and awareness of the speech. The summation can also be expanded to cover the key points already delivered by the preceding speakers. This ensures that these key components will remain fresh in the minds of the judges.

How to Cite

Main Topics

Privacy Policy

September/October Topic - Resolved: Unilateral military force by the United States is justified to prevent nuclear proliferation.

Privacy FAQs

There is more to a debate speech than the mere delivery of arguments and rebuttals. No doubt these two elements form the backbone of a debate speech. However, the following elements are crucial in making a speech interesting, memorable and easy to follow for the judges.

About Our Ads

How to Create a Debate Speech A debate is a formal, friendly competition between two people or two teams that take opposing sides on an issue -- a proposition side that is in favor of adopting a resolution and an opposition side that refutes the resolution. Writing A Debate Speech Structure Usually six paragraphs Introduction Point One Refuting Point or Points Made By Opposition Point Two Point Three Conclusion. Introduction ‘Good evening chairperson, distinguished guests, fellow speakers.

Cookie Info

First Affirmative Speaker Template 1 INTRODUCTION 1. Good afternoon Mr/Madam (During the debate write on a rebuttal card what your opposition’s third speaker has said if that is Speech Structure Templates Author: Debating SA Incorporated. Writing the Debate Speech 1. Write an introduction that is catchy and interesting. Who does not love a good and catchy introduction? But for these kinds of situations, it is best to stay mindful as the whole point of this debate lies in the formality sense which is something to be taken seriously.