Skip Nav

Freakonomics Essay

Freakonomics. Custom Freakonomics Essay Writing Service || Freakonomics Essay samples, help

❶Think Like a Freak. Supporting their arguments as to why abortion has played a significant role in decreasing crime in the s United States.

How to cite this page

Similar Essay Topics
Rhetoric in Freakonomics: How professionals keep validity while catering to more casual audiences

They morally or socially believed they had to pick up their child on time, but now that an economic incentive was implemented they did not feel morally responsible to be on time and just paid the fine. Also in chapter one, we saw the incentive for teachers and their students to do well on standardized testing for more school funding or even to keep their job, so teachers act out irrationally and help students cheat on standardizing testing.

Getting the optimal price on a house and time consuming. They feel their time is more valuable then putting forth more effort in selling a house knowing they can sell it faster at a cheaper price. There are many examples throughout the book of incentives, but the one I found most interesting was the issue of drug dealers still living at home in chapter three. Higher ranker officials however are more interested in making money since they are already in a position of high status.

Overall I believe Freakonomics illustrates basic economic principles. Levitt and Dubner lay out many underlying themes in the book, Freakonomics, but there are many reoccurring themes throughout. The three major themes that I found throughout the book are: These three basic economic principles are just a few of the major themes in the book, but I believe are enough evidence to convinced the reader that Freakonomics does cover major economic principles and is a book of economics.

In all, Freakonomics is a brilliant book that incorporates everyday ideas into economic ones. It truly is a book about economics and the evidence given proves this.

Accessed September 14, Dubner specifically for you. Leave your email and we will send you an example after 24 hours If you contact us after hours, we'll get back to you in 24 hours or less. How to cite this page Choose cite format: How about make it original?

Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. Dubner send By clicking "Send", you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. Overall, the scholarly writing heavily uses charts, statistics, and outside references, as opposed to the focus on logic-based arguments in Freakonomics. Outside quotes and statistics are taken from reliable institutions and experts in the field, including Carnegie Mellon University, representatives from the Internal Revenue Service, and a variety of expert economists.

While Freakonomics is considered to be written primarily to cater to an average layperson, it is also written to cater to experts in the fields that it explores. The rhetoric used in the book is not quite like that of a magazine or news story; the content is more thoroughly cited and comprehensive.

At the same time, the content is not quite like that of a formal scholarly writing; the content takes a more casual tone and focuses more heavily on the logic behind arguments, rather than barraging the reader with statistics and redirecting the reader to other studies. An example of this is seen in the chapter discussed previously; when the authors discuss the argument of how an improving economy caused crime to decrease, they begin by stating why this argument has logical flaws the improving economy does not account for the decrease in crimes that are not financially motivated and follow this with well explained statistics to support the argument.

From analysis and review of the writings of Stephen J. Levitt, several conclusions can be derived regarding rhetoric, argumentation, and the expression of ideas. When catering to audiences that consist largely of laypeople, writing must place high emphasis on clear, logical analysis and argumentation; this writing must be clear to readers and must make sense.

While reference to outside sources provides additional validity, the most important aspect must be providing information that is makes logical sense and that readers will continue to read. The results that come with writing in this manner are evident in Freakononmics: Arguments published in the book are taken seriously by professionals and laymen alike.

By implementing the style of rhetoric used in Freakonomics, authors are able to easily present ideas in a manner that is both strong and understandable, allowing for ideas to be heard effectively. Want an original paper written on a topic like these? Get in touch or place an order! Academic work can bring plenty of stress! How professionals keep validity while catering to more casual audiences Jul 12, Example Papers.

A sample Freakonomics essay is below! How professionals keep validity while catering to more casual audiences Section 1: Introduction Any modern day poll, study, or analysis will reveal that the citizens of the United States are largely split on the issue of the legalization of abortion. Summary and Discussion of Arguments The chapter of Freakonomics that discusses the issue of crime reduction can be split into three main sections: Summarization and analysis of other hypotheses for the reduction of crime in the s 3.

In the second chapter, the reader is introduced to the term information asymmetry. As the two authors describe, this term refers to the instance when a person willfully uses information o his or her advantage, but at the expense of others. Using the Ku Klux Klan as an example, the authors show how information asymmetry can be harmful to any society and to those who practice it.

The authors reveal that this outfit had so many secrets in all its operations. In the third chapter, the authors enlighten the reader about conventional wisdom. The authors hold that conventional wisdom is simply false because most experts often make lies or skew data to serve their own interests. In the fourth chapter, the Levitt and Dubner introduce the reader to a very intriguing subject of legalizing abortion.

Using available data and the case of Roe v. According to them, babies that would have been born in the s would most likely have ended up being criminals since their criminal careers would have peaked in the year Comparing this scenario with what happened in Romania in , he two authors are able to prove that legalizing abortion is strongly related to plunging crime rates in America as compared to the rise of criminal activities in the communist Romania.

In the fifth chapter, Levitt and Dubner claim that research disapproves the belief held by most parents that what they do to their children determines whether they will succeed or fail. This chapter commences with a discourse on the recent surge of experts in parental matters who present conflicting opinions about good parenting.

This book explains that despite the contradictory opinions of these experts, they all seem to be confident that their assertions are true because none wishes to doubt their own theories. In the sixth chapter, the authors conduct a comprehensive research on names and, specifically, whether the name given to a person has any effect on his or her life.

Moreover, they investigate why parents give their children certain names in the first place. Freakonomics discusses in details, how whites and blacks name their children differently, and whether naming your child a distinctively black or white-surrounding name affects its life outcome. Since its publication in , the book has received immense criticism and support from economists and academicians.

On the stronger side, Freakonomics is not only an intellectual romp, but also an entertaining literary work. From the onset, it is apparent that Levitt and Dubner are very good at asking questions and providing answers to a variety of questions.

It can be seen that Levitt is exceptional at using various tools that he has mastered in hhis long career as an economist to answer some of the questions posed in the novel in interesting ways. This attribute is what makes Freakonomics worth reading.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Freakonomics study guide contains a biography of Steven D. Levitt, literature essays, quiz questions, major themes, characters, and a full summary and analysis.

Privacy FAQs

Strong Essays words | ( pages) | Preview An Analysis of Freakonomics, by Steven D. Levitt - Economics in reverse is the best way of describing the unconventional method preferred by .

About Our Ads

Essay on An Analysis of Freakonomics, by Steven D. Levitt - Economics in reverse is the best way of describing the unconventional method preferred by economist, Steven D. Levitt. While most economists measure social situations and present the data as numbers and graphs Levitt takes anomalies within the data to reveal truths obscured. Nov 07,  · Freakonomics Essay Words | 3 Pages the result was Freakonomics, a book that claims to explore the hidden side of everything, using real-life examples such as studies and polls conducted by Levitt to explain how economics is everywhere, that .

Cookie Info

Jul 12,  · Working on a Freakonomics essay for a class? Save yourself the headache and contact the Jittery Monks! Send us a message for a no-obligation quote on your academic project! A sample Freakonomics essay is below! Rhetoric in Freakonomics: How professionals keep validity while catering to more casual audiences Section 1: Introduction Any modern day poll, [ ]. Freakonomics Book Review Essay Justin Rayome Dr. Ditloff International Relations 6 March Levitt, Steven D, and Stephen J. Dubner. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of .