Skip Nav

Sample IELTS refugees essay

The Center for High-Quality Student Work

❶Again you want to try and look for some alternatives.

Sections/Site Map/Menu..

Writing Assignment Description:
Get more help with IELTS preparation on the main pages of my site
Who Refugees Are

They are versions of questions that have appeared. I try to keep them as close to exam format as possible. Your techniques are amazing and I wish my girlfriend will learn and use them on her up coming test in the next 2 weeks. Your techniques are amazing and I wish my girlfriend would learn and use them on her up coming test in the next 2 weeks.

Many many thanks for thanks for this site I saw it very useful and is helping me a lot specially in writing section My feeling that in this essay there is a misconception between refugees and immigrants, whereas there is a big difference between them. And the points you make are good ones. Though I am not sure the distinction is quite as clear as you believe.

This was a category of person who left one country often illegally to seek a better life elsewhere. In many cases, the countries they were fleeing had very repressive regimes.

Which phrase you used depended on where you stood. I think it is. Just did a quick internet search. Take a look at this fact sheet from the Australian Government headed Australian Immigration Fact Sheet 60 on the internet — it discusses refugees. Immigration, in my view, can be taken as a very broad term.

And refugees still come under immigration law. I shall get a new one posted. Email will not be published. Get the lesson Understanding the question One of the major problems facing the world today is the growing number of refugees. Part 4 listening practice. Comparisons in task 1 tables. KC July 14, at 7: Lana August 1, at 9: TED August 7, at 2: Dominic Cole August 7, at 3: Lana August 8, at 3: Dominic Cole August 8, at 3: Samuel mathon August 23, at 2: Dominic Cole August 23, at 7: Additional insights about refugees are offered by Beyond Intractability project participants.

When one crosses an international border, one is supposed to be protected by international law and is eligible to receive assistance from the UNHCR and other NGOs. Many countries recognize their duty to assist refugees, but not all are forthcoming in providing such assistance.

Especially in instances of mass violence and mass exodus, a neighboring country lacks the resources or does not wish to welcome such a large number of refugees. Refugees are often thought to strain the resources, land, economy, and culture of the host country. For many refugees, returning home is their eventual goal, but only when the government has changed or when the violence has ended. Voluntary repatriation is the ideal, but is not always possible.

Unfortunately, some countries refuse to allow refugees to enter and receive protection or the countries only allow refugees to stay a short time and then forcibly repatriate them, often placing refugees in the same dangerous situations that they fled in the first place.

Ideally, a refugee will only remain in the host country for a short time. Intractable conflict, however, often prevents voluntary repatriation. Refugees either end up living in camps for years with little or no hope of returning, or they attempt to become residents of another country. By applying for asylum, a refugee can ask a host government for permission to legally reside and work in the country.

Each country has its own unique asylum procedures, but all offer the government's protection from deportment and freedom of movement. Asylum-seekers can cause political headaches, however, as governments are torn between upholding their moral obligations to protect the persecuted, and their obligations to provide adequate services to their own citizens. In some cases, asylum-seekers put a great economic and cultural strain on a host country.

All asylum-seekers need the host nation's social services, but those who are poor, unskilled laborers will be able to contribute little to the nation's tax base. These people will require education and training, which will likely be grudgingly provided by the host country's taxpayers.

Some asylum-seekers will also require language training and their children will have special educational needs as well. Despite these potential drawbacks, governments award asylum to thousands of refugees every year. Even though there are always more applicants than can be provided for, many nations, including the United States, accept asylum-seekers and assist them in adjusting to their new lives.

Notable examples include political refugees from China and the so-called Lost Boys of Sudan, a group of boys who walked to refugee camps in Ethiopia and Kenya before finally beginning new lives throughout the United States.

Refugees who fail to cross an international border do not technically qualify as refugees, nor are they eligible for the protection of international law and many refugee services. These internally-displaced persons flee human-rights abuses and violence exactly like refugees do, yet they are turned away at international borders or unable to reach a border due to the dangers that surround them. Because of the stricter regulations on refugees and the closing of many borders to those who need protection, the problem of IDPs is ever-increasing.

Currently, more than 25 million people are displaced by conflict around the world; more than double the number of refugees. Over 12 million IDPs reside in Africa, more than on any other continent. Potential refugees decide that it is safer to stay in their home country than to try their luck in another.

Without better conflict resolution and protection of human-rights standards around the world, the future appears bleak for those innocent victims caught in the middle. They will continue to be forced from their homes in attempts to flee violence, with the hope that they can finally find safety in other countries.

Imagine a street with a cluster of six houses, all containing families of various compositions and income levels. The homes are close enough together that the neighbors know each other. Some of the neighbors are friends and some just don't get along.

Occasionally a neighbor will visit another neighbor, solidifying relations between them. And sometimes one neighbor will do something that offends another. One day an argument breaks out in the house of neighbor A. Two family members are arguing over who has control of the family finances.

The neighbors hear the argument, and some are concerned, while others try to ignore the problem. After a few days the conflict escalates.

The screaming gets louder and the neighbors hear gunshots. Immediately a member of the household, John, runs out. Two members of his family are fighting and they have shot at each other, though no one is hurt. Obviously, John felt threatened by the shots and left the house.

John no longer feels safe in his home and so he tries to find a safe place to stay until the arguing parties resolve their conflict. John knocks on neighbor B's door and asks if he can come in to safety. The neighbor expresses sympathy for John and gives him some food but says that he cannot come in. Neighbor B already has a full house and is worried that the family doesn't have enough money to house another person for an unknown amount of time. Neighbor B encourages the man to try another house.

John, still fleeing, now tries neighbor C's door. John looks in the door and sees that another argument is taking place in this house, one potentially more dangerous than the one in his own house. He decides to try another house. But the point still remains, of course, that the European Union must somehow deal with this influx of people into its constituent nations.

One of the main points about this situation that has been covered by the news has consisted of the fact that many migrants have in fact died while attempting to make the journey into Europe. Kitsantonis, for example, reported the following regarding a very recent incident: Greece has been a favored crossing point into Europe for many of the migrants involved in the current situation, for obvious geographical reasons; and this means that the primary route of entry is across the Aegean Sea Kakissis.

However, given the lack of regulation in the migration process and potentially inadequate vessels of transportation, the migrants are in fact putting themselves in substantial danger. Many have drowned thus far, and this could be expected to continue happening unless some kind of legal oversight and regulation is introduced into the situation.

Tasch and Nudelman have provided a good map of the flow of migrants into the European Union. According to this map, the migrants emerge from a broad range of nations in Africa and the Middle East, including Libya, Mali, Tunisia, Yemen, and Syria. The migrants tend to head toward major cities on the coast including Tripoli and Benghazi in Libya, Cairo in Egypt, and Istanbul in Turkey. From this point, the migrants seek to cross into Europe, primarily through the nations of Greece and Italy.

Their final destination, however, is generally further north, with Germany and Scandinavia being popular targets. Insofar as the current situation is a migration crisis, though, it would seem that it is the duty of the European Union as a whole, and not just its individual constituent nations, to formulate and implement a coherent policy and address the situation in an effective way.

Efforts in this regard will be discussed a little later on. For now, though, perhaps it would be worthwhile to turn to a consideration of the underlying causes of the current situation. One of the main causes of the current migration crisis clearly consists of political turmoil and instability in the homelands of the migrants. As Park has written, for example: The number of illegal border-crossing detections in the EU [European Union] started to surge in , as thousands of Tunisians started to arrive at the Italian island of Lampedusa following the onset of the Arab Spring" paragraph 2.

Events such as the Arab Spring , then, have produced instability in many nations in the Middle East and Africa; this instability has disrupted the livelihoods of many people; and those people then seek to migrate to the European Union in order to take refuge from the chaos in their homelands.

Although this is a broad sketch, it nevertheless captures the essence of the main causes underlying the current migration crisis within the European Union. Analyzing the situation in a more detailed way, Trofimov has pointed out that in a certain sense, the migration crisis at the present time is a result of Western action—or lack thereof—within the Middle East over the past several year.

As he has written: More than half the population has been forced to flee their homes" paragraph 2. These refugees initially fled to neighboring nations such as Turkey and Jordan, but they are now increasingly making their way to Europe. Trofimov's point would seem to be that if the United States and the European Union had more effectively intervened to prevent political upheaval in the Middle East, then the present migration crisis could have been avoided, since the migrants would not have felt compelled to leave their homelands in the first place.

At the present time, the European Union would seem to be more or less scrambling to pull together a workable and coherent policy that can enable it to deal with the migration crisis in an effective way. The nation of Hungary, for example, has come under criticism for the actions it has taken recently against the migrants: The use of force by the Hungarian authorities, a turning point in the migration crisis, drew criticism from the United Nations" Eddy, Orovic, and Bilefsky, paragraph It has been generally understood that it is not acceptable to treat the migrants in this way; however, the event in a way highlights the tensions and frustrations that have come to characterize the efforts of both individual nations and the European Union as a whole to respond to the situation in a meaningful way.


Main Topics

Privacy Policy

Compare and contrast Auden’s and Faulks’ use of detail establish a feeling of alienation in ‘Refugee Blues’ and ‘The Last Night’ Both Sebastian Faulks and W. H. Auden write about the tales of Jewish refugees living in the time of holocaust during WW2 in their two pieces, ‘The Last Night’ and ‘Refugee Blues’.

Privacy FAQs

- In this essay I am going to look at the reasons why many Palestinians became refugees in I am going to look at it from both the point of view of the Palestinians and the Israelis. Violence on both Israeli, and Palestinian sides increased during

About Our Ads

The majority of refugees come from developing countries like Afghanistan and Iraq. Stage 2 in the movement of refugees is living in a refugee camp. There may be thousands of refugees living in one camp. An example of a refugee camp is Jazolai, a sprawling squalid refugee settlement near the mouth of Khyber Pass in Pakistan/5(5). Format(s): Essay. Subject(s): English Language Arts. Type(s): Argument/Opinion. Writing Assignment Description: Using the EL Education unit, Finding Home: Refugees, students analyzed the novel Inside Out & Back Again to argue how the title of the novel relates to the universal refugee experience of fleeing and finding home. The End of .

Cookie Info

Feb 03,  · Essays on Refugees Term: Refugee and Syria - Words Believing that increased aid to to Syrian refugees will encourage stability, Deploring direct military involvement, Supports the UNHCR Desiring a peaceful Syria, 1. The United Nation Convention on refugees is the key legal document in defining who is a refugee, explaining their rights and defining the legal obligation of states. The .